reviews, features & interviews

Tyler joins the mothership–bigger, better, beautiful

By

September 9, 2008   ·   8 Comments

Roberta, Greg Murphy, John Coll, Libby
Photo by Hillel Hoffman. Roberta; Greg Murphy, assistant dean for development; John Coll, project superintendent; and Libby, looking up at the soaring atrium ceiling.

Tyler School of Art has been Temple University‘s best kept secret division for years. But now that the scrappy little art school–arguably the best incubator for new artists in a region filled with great art schools–has been forced by the mothership to give up its bucolic Elkins Park campus and move to 12th and Norris, the connection will be clearer.

It’s a good move!!!

Tyler’s $75 million new building, still under construction, is space-age spectacular.  Even with some windows and doors and finishes missing, it’s a beauty, with rakish angles, airy spaces, and dramatic light, designed by architect Carlos Jimenez, with support from Philadelphia architects H2L2.

IMG_7594 The lobby, viewed from above
The towering lobby of the new building also provides an entrance to the Presser Building of Temple’s Boyer College of Music and Dance, giving Tyler another connection to its new location. photo by Libby

We know all this because we took a hard hat tour, led by Gregory Murphy, Tyler’s assistant dean for development; John Coll, one of the three project superintendents; and Hillel Hoffman, assistant director for Temple p.r. We thank them for rolling out the terrazzo floors and the makeshift wood ramps for us.

The building is not just another pretty face. It’s a gift to the city as well as to Tyler and Temple.

The new professional gallery space, where Temple Gallery will relocate, is not only beautiful, but is enormous and equipped to handle 4,000 pound sculptures. The studios and equipment and high-tech air-handling (a must in a field like art, where toxic materials are commonplace) almost made us wish we were back in school!

Looking down on atrium from 2nd floor
Looking down on the atrium from the 2nd floor. Note green color on pillars. There will be bright colors all over the public spaces (white in the studios of course). photo by roberta

If you’ve been used to Tyler’s old campus, with its cubby-hole studios and cramped exhibition spaces, you will jump for joy at the amazing equipment and the wide open spaces. Here are some examples: eight glory holes for cooking glass, up from two in Elkins Park; a whole room filled with potter’s wheels; loads digital equipment for photography–plus high-tech safety-minded wet-process equipment; vast spaces and cranes for sculpture; nearly a whole side of the building with advanced painting studios with palatial doors and celestial ceilings high enough to handle enormous paintings).

We’re not even talking about amenities like decks for lounging and a cafe for cafe-ing and looking out the windows.

Entrance to new Tyler School of Art
Entrance to new Tyler School of Art. Just picture your name above the door for a $75 million donation. photo by roberta

The building is scheduled for completion in October, and expected to go into use January 2009. While we were walking through, we learned that 160 workers were on the job. Everywhere we looked, there they were, practically tripping over each other to finish the building in time for its impending completion date. Six of the workers were women, and we saw three of them at work as we toured.

The building has about 240,000 state-of-the-art square feet of space, many of those with naming rights still available. For instance, for a $7.5 million donation, you can get the building named after you.  A gallery’s naming rights, $1.5 million. Or, if you are a more typical artblog reader (just kidding), you might want to consider having graduate studios named after you, for $25,000 each. Why stop at just one?

IMG_7517
Workers moving a stack of plywood. Everywhere we looked, people were working to finish the building. photo by Libby

Green is big in this building. We’re not just talking about the green accent walls; or the green gardens for exhibiting sculpture. The building includes a number of green and health-conscious and art-conscious features. We especially like that the rain run-off from the roof gets redirected to slowly dissipate into the ground, said project superintendent Coll. The air handling system is massive because of the toxicity of art materials. It’s a closed building, said Murphy.

We took a lot of great pictures–of studio spaces, equipment, building mechanicals, and just things we liked looking at, but it was tough to capture the vastness of the spaces in this building. Here’s a link to our flickr sets to see more: Roberta’s pix. Libby’s pix.

Tags: , ,


Readers Comments (8)

  1. hawkie says:

    YOU had it right the first time – it is a $75 million building.

     
  2. libby says:

    Is that a complaint about money or compliment on the value of investing in art? Ambiguous!
    My position is not ambiguous. This building is wonderful.

     
  3. ambocow says:

    Out of all the articles and blogs I have read concerning the Tyler move, there was one – yes, just the one – that had a comment from an actual Tyler student. And it was a short one at that. Journalists, authors, and the like are asking only main campus students and faculty. Doesn’t anyone care about the opinions of those who are actually relocating?

     
  4. roberta says:

    Hawkie, I don’t get your comment either. Sounds like you think the building cost too much. Buildings like this do cost a lot. But the school needs a change and change costs money. Tyler’s physical plant in Elkins Park is small and deteriorating. The undergrad program is growing (applications were way up this last year). Safe, clean, studios and new exhibition spaces in a light-filled airy building — it’s for the better. Also, it’s good for Tyler to be more directly connected to the city.

    Ambocow, all comments about the move are welcome here. If you know students who have opinions they’d like to share, we’d love to have them on artblog. Any change is hard and an adjustment and the Tyler faculty we know have adjusted. I imagine the students will adjust as well. When my daughter was in 4th grade they closed her elementary school for a year to build an addition and retrofit the old building. All the kids were bused to a different school for six months. Then they moved back into the old/new school. It was a big disruption. But in the end the new (expensive) building was worth it.

     
  5. Aaron Lee says:

    I’m sure plenty of others have pointed it out, but the building is $75, while the naming rights are $7.5 million (not $75mil).

    Nice article though, and the pictures are great for us eager students unable to take the tour ourselves.

     
  6. roberta says:

    Aaron, thanks for the money clarification — I corrected the post so it now reflects the correct decimalization with either 75 ($75M for the building; $7.5M for the naming rights). sheesh, we’re a little overworked and underpaid here at artblog and some things just take a little time to get straight. glad to hear from you though and you will like this building alot!

     
  7. Jay says:

    When I went to Tyler in Elkins Park in 1999/2000, they said I would be in the “last class at Elkins Park”. Well, it’s been a long wait, and I can’t wait to tour the new building. Thanks for the virtual tour. Makes me wish I was going to be using the studios there.

     
  8. libby says:

    We also wish we could use the studios. They looked just great!!! The only downside to such wonderful, pristine spaces is it makes it less welcoming to do the kinds of studio personalization that students did in the old dump–putting in false floors, painting the walls, etc.