By roberta
June 10, 2008 · 3 Comments
This week’s Weekly has my review of Solid Gold at Vox Populi. Below is the copy with some pictures. More photos at flickr.
Vox Populi’s fourth annual emerging artist show is a lovely human-centric affair full of narrative art with many stories that attempt, each in its own way, to explain the vulnerable place humankind is at right now.

Edward Carey, A Jack Hammer is So Real. 2007. digital video DVD. detail. Here the artist is climbing the face of a church.
Video works are especially adept at telling human stories. Videos by Zach Rockhill, Edward Carey and Pamela Sunstrum show bodies interacting with and sometimes under assault by their environments. These artists are performers in the tradition of ’70s endurance-art greats Vito Acconci and Chris Burden. Happily, the young artists temper their silent, action-packed pieces with lighter moments that bring the spirit of Charlie Chaplin to the mix.

Zack Rockhill, This Side Down, Damn if I Know. 2007. video. detail.
Rockhill’s short looping video (with great swooshing audio) in which the artist gets bandied about in a room that appears to be freed from gravity and logic is a mesmerizing work about chaos, chance and control.

Pamela Sunstrum, detail from her performance video.
Sunstrum performs a gustatory feat—eating an endless hank of black hair. At times the film rewinds and the hair comes out of her mouth instead of going in. The piece made me gag. While it’s not a new thought, it reminds me of how we fetishize hair, and how young women especially are trapped in a culture that is focused unhealthily on bodily perfection.

Bang-Geul Han, Steven and Jared. interactive video.
It’s not surprising that words and the alphabet make an appearance. Language rules our lives in many ways. Bang-Geul Han’s video Steven and Jared projects a randomly swirling alphabet soup of letters on a large wall while two small audio speakers nearby play the voices of children reading texts about language, translation, the Internet and an NPR-induced headache.

Abby Donovan, Some of What Don Quixote Said, fired clay.
The innocence of the children’s voices stumbling through wordy sentences plays nicely against the bouncing letters of the video. Language here is a meaningless and headache-producing babble. Abby Donovan’s pile of handmade clay alphabet letters on the floor seems to have popped right out of Han’s video. Some of What Don Quixote Said is a perfect memorial to the voluble knight whose story of impossible goals reverberates today.

Daniel Payavis subverts words and letters by turning them into hard-edged design elements in his stark and beautiful small paintings.

R. Nick Barbee, Thomas Jefferson
Also worth mentioning are R. Nick Barbee’s Thomas Jefferson figurine and his backyard taxonomy paintings of birds, trees and clouds (which seem to be channeling Lewis and Clark);

William Lohre’s Midas, detail.
William Lohre’s cardboard depiction of the King Midas story;

Mark Klassen’s Street Transformer, 2007.
Mark Klassen’s deadpan mini-models of an office desk, a drop ceiling and a transformer box;

Lee Arnold, Stereo, 2007. Super 8 film with sound
Lee Arnold’s dreamy black-and-white video about vision and memory;

Samuel Ekwurtzel, Untitled 2006/08. polyurethene foam, oscillator. The piece shook like it had just seen a ghost.
and Samuel Ekwurtzel’s untitled white sculptural lamb, a little motorized sweetie that quivers and quakes, and in light of the show’s theme could be a stand-in for us all—alone, all alone, poor little lamb.
“Solid Gold” Through June 27.
Free. Vox Populi, 319A N. 11th St., third fl.
215.238.1236.
Tags: abby donovan, bang-geul han, bill lohre, daniel payavis, edward carey, lee arnold, mark klassen, pamela sunstrum, r. nick barbee, samuel ekwurtzel, solid gold, vox populi gallery, zack rockhill
I know it’s a little late for me to comment on this post, but i have to say it. I thought Solid Gold was terrible. There was some very strong work present, but could not be appreciated because of the arbitrary selection. It was as if the work was selected (not considering what worked well together, disregarding any type of theme) and then randomly placed into the gallery spaces. Anyone out there agree?
not me. I loved it. I thought the work in there was quite interesting and engaging. I was fascinated by R. Nick Barbee’s pieces. I love all the letter pieces, the videos, the shaking lamb. And Mark Klassen’s pieces–how about the dropped ceiling one. I laughed out loud. It’s great!
That’s a lot of stuff to love in a small group show.
Since the show is not a theme show but a kind of vox “annual” it’s not the point to go looking for a theme. The point (like in the biennials which this resembles) is to round up interesting, provocative work and put it out there and let the viewers see a broad range of what’s being made right now.
That said, I thought there were many allegiances among the works. The two letter pieces, the three performance videos, and all those mini models and tableaus with and without people.
I, too, thought it was a terrific show.